Reorder folders based on learning dependencies, complexity, and frequency of use: - 01-slash-commands (unchanged) - Quick wins for beginners - 02-memory (was 03) - Essential foundation - 03-skills (was 05) - Auto-invoked capabilities - 04-subagents (was 02) - Task delegation - 05-mcp (was 04) - External integration - 06-hooks (was 07) - Event automation - 07-plugins (was 06) - Bundled solutions - 08-checkpoints (unchanged) - Safe experimentation - 09-advanced-features (unchanged) - Power user tools Documentation improvements: - Add LEARNING-ROADMAP.md with detailed milestones and exercises - Simplify README.md for better scannability - Consolidate Quick Start and Getting Started sections - Combine Feature Comparison and Use Case Matrix tables - Reorder README sections: Learning Path → Quick Reference → Getting Started - Update all cross-references across module READMEs 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
name, description, version, tags, when_to_use
| name | description | version | tags | when_to_use | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code Review Specialist | Comprehensive code review with security, performance, and quality analysis | 1.0.0 |
|
When users ask to review code, analyze code quality, or evaluate pull requests |
Code Review Skill
This skill provides comprehensive code review capabilities focusing on:
-
Security Analysis
- Authentication/authorization issues
- Data exposure risks
- Injection vulnerabilities
- Cryptographic weaknesses
- Sensitive data logging
-
Performance Review
- Algorithm efficiency (Big O analysis)
- Memory optimization
- Database query optimization
- Caching opportunities
- Concurrency issues
-
Code Quality
- SOLID principles
- Design patterns
- Naming conventions
- Documentation
- Test coverage
-
Maintainability
- Code readability
- Function size (should be < 50 lines)
- Cyclomatic complexity
- Dependency management
- Type safety
Review Template
For each piece of code reviewed, provide:
Summary
- Overall quality assessment (1-5)
- Key findings count
- Recommended priority areas
Critical Issues (if any)
- Issue: Clear description
- Location: File and line number
- Impact: Why this matters
- Severity: Critical/High/Medium
- Fix: Code example
Findings by Category
Security (if issues found)
List security vulnerabilities with examples
Performance (if issues found)
List performance problems with complexity analysis
Quality (if issues found)
List code quality issues with refactoring suggestions
Maintainability (if issues found)
List maintainability problems with improvements